Lie-proof your life with Carl Sagan’s “baloney detection” checklist course of their training, scientists are equipped with a baloney-detection kit. Based on the book “The Demon Haunted World: Science as a candle in the dark” published by Headline, The following are suggested as tools for testing. The Fine Art of Baloney Detection is an essay by Carl Sagan in his constitutes what Sagan very politely calls a “Baloney Detection Kit.
|Published (Last):||3 November 2013|
|PDF File Size:||17.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.65 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Baloney Detection Kit
See if you can find reasons for rejecting it. Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric: Spin more than one hypothesis – don’t simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy. Remembering the instances where you predicted that it would rain for an event, while ignoring all of the instances where you predicted rain and there was none.
This assumes the answer to the question. Views Read Edit Fossil record.
These are all in Sagan’s words: So it is with evolutionwhich also is host to minor disagreements as to how it happened, e.
Non sequitur – “it does not follow” – the logic falls down. Slippery slope – a subset of excluded middle – unwarranted extrapolation of the effects give an inch detectuon they will take a mile.
Perhaps a better way to say it is that in science there are no authorities; at most, there are experts. Currently the earth’s magnetic field is decreasing in intensity.
Sagan makes a few suggestions about the “tools” a skeptic should keep balonsy in their Baloney Detection Kit. Observational selection counting the hits and forgetting the misses.
Misunderstanding the nature of statistics President Eisenhower expressed astonishment and alarm on discovering that fully half of all Americans have below average intelligence!
It is also called “circular reasoning” or “circular kkit. In other words, is it testable? Begging the question assuming an answer in the way the question is phrased. Excluded middle, or false dichotomy. If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.
Weasel words – for example, use of euphemisms for war such as “police action” to get around limitations on Presidential powers.
Carl Sagan’s Baloney Detection Kit
If gay marriage is legalized, detectiom of our children will be converted to homosexuality, and Satan will win. Evidence, of course, suggests that the earth’s magnetic field not only waxes and wanes, but even switches polarity every so often.
These are all in Sagan’s words:. Caricaturing or stereotyping a position to make it easier to attack. Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified shown to be false by some unambiguous test. What is vague and qualitative is open to many explanations.
The Baloney Detection Kit
Statistics of small numbers such as drawing conclusions from inadequate sample sizes. Get the best cultural and educational resources on the web curated for you in a daily email. Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.
Ad hominem – attacking the arguer and not the argument. External links Twitter Facebook Discord.
But we’re not sure. Never mind that there is no evidence for it. Slippery sloperelated to excluded middle. Excluded middle – considering only the two extremes in a range of possibilities bwloney the “other side” look worse than it really is.
The Wisdom of Carl Sagan Animated.
Comments 0 Be the first to comment. Caarl from authority carry little weight in science there are no “authorities”.
Weasel words – saan example, use of euphemisms for war such as “police action” to get around limitations on Presidential powers. Ignorance about central statistical assumptions and the definition of metrics.
Thus, God makes people happy if they go to church. Try not to get kt attached to a hypothesis just because it’s yours. Always ask whether the hypothesis can be, at least in principle, falsified…. Then think of tests by which you might systematically disprove each of the alternatives. Additional issues are Conduct control experiments – naloney “double blind” experiments where the person taking measurements is not aware of the test and control subjects.
Archive All posts by date. For concerns on copyright infringement please see: Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by RationalWiki: