Libros de Segunda Mano – Ciencias, Manuales y Oficios – Otros: Teoria general del estado. autor: georg jellinek. Compra, venta y subastas de Otros en. Libros Antiguos, Raros y Curiosos – Pensamiento – Política: Teoria general del estado. georg jellinek. Compra, venta y subastas de Política en todocoleccion. Teoría general del Estado (Politica Y Derecho): Georg, Jellinek. Stock Image From: OMM Campus Libros (Madrid, MADRI, Spain). Seller Rating: · 5-star rating.
|Published (Last):||24 November 2010|
|PDF File Size:||9.18 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Thirdly, it will reflect on the arguments in favor of asserting that the Antarctic Treaty has generated custom in international public law for third party states. The hypothesis that will guide this work consists in asserting that the protection mechanisms of the Antarctic territory contemplated in the Antarctic Treaty could be insufficient legally against third party states. This is how, with the boost provided by the success of the International Geophysical Year and the establishment of the North American policy on Antarctica, the United States proposed the diplomatic conference teoriw would lead to, not without difficulties 31the signing of the Antarctic Treaty on December 1,which had as its pillars the previously listed North American objectives and the proposed “Plan Escudero ” that is currently Article IV of the treaty The States concerned must therefore feel that they are conforming to what amounts to a legal obligation” When considering that South Africa had been genfral from the United Nations General Assembly, the final text of the resolution on the ” Question of Antarctica ” in this session deals in a benevolent way with the condemnation of South Africa in the following terms: The mechanisms laid out in the Antarctic Treaty, with their handicaps, have been successful in protecting the white continent, but according to the principle of law uellinek tertiis nec nocent nec prosuntthese mechanisms are only applicable to the states that are party to this treaty and are not applicable to more than states on the planet that are party to the United Nations Organization, but that have not signed the Antarctic Treaty.
Georg Jellinek by Jorge Enrique Ramírez Pérez on Prezi Next
Given the requirement of sovereignty for the jellinei of a determined territory, seven states 10 have claimed sovereignty over each part of the Antarctic territory. Consultative and Non-Consultative Parties. What would happen if some state that is not party is unaware of the provisions in the Antarctic Treaty, or if a state party to the treaty denounces it and subsequently claims to not recognize the institutionality of Antarctica? In the case of controversy over exercising jurisdiction, a mechanism of Immediate Consultation is sustained with the objective of reaching a mutually acceptable solution.
Prepared by the author based on the resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations Organization. Additionally, it establishes a regime for specific protection with respect to certain Antarctic flora and fauna “Protected Species” and it establishes special zones in the Antarctic territory such as in the case of the “Especially Protected Zones” and “Sites of Special Scientific Interest”.
Except for China and Peru, all of the states parties to the Antarctic Nellinek announced that they would not participate in the vote. With regard to the usage of the Antarctic territory for peaceful purposes, the situation is similar to that of the cases on freedom of scientific research since the precedents are not sufficient in the past and what had happened before the Antarctic Treaty was a fight to ensure territorial claims, as has already been mentioned.
Establish a collective, estaado administration on jellinke of the directly involved states. This mechanism of National Jurisdiction and Immediate Consultations are backed by the Consultative Meetings, which will be dealt with further along, but some practical cases that have been presented have revealed serious deficiencies, such as those in the following examples: Impact evaluation on the environment. In the opinion of the Court, Nicaragua, through its expressed statements and by its behavior, recognized the validity of the award and now cannot return this recognition to appeal the validity of the award.
The research problem that it was attempting to solve concerned the legal situation in the case that the own mechanisms of the mentioned teoris should fail in protecting its legally protected interests, concretely if it could be argued that the principles in the Antarctic Treaty have constituted custom in international public law and, therefore, it is source of valid law against third party gerog that are not party to the Antarctic Treaty.
International Scientific Cooperation and exchange of: Argentina followed in Aprilas well as Chile 38Norway, and the United Kingdom in May with different degrees of claims. When faced with the suspension of territorial claims and the restriction on state sovereignty being exercised in Antarctica, the aforementioned Antarctic Treaty establishes various mechanisms for the protection of the Antarctic territory and in its Article XIII rules that “it shall be open for accession by any State that is a Member of the United Nations, or by any other State which may be invited to accede to the Treaty with the consent of all the Contracting Parties … “.
Gaddis, John Lewis It cannot be stressed enough that the mentioned principles currently are being put to the test by some of the trends that are being seen in Antarctic activities, such as bioprospecting 34the regulating of aquatic subglacial research 35tourism, climate change, whale hunting 36and the problem of the continental shelf, which is a topic of great importance in the Chilean Antarctic policy 37 and to which we will dedicate a few sentences.
Measures of a military character Article I, A. Conservation of the Antarctic flora and fauna.
The literal meaning of b. These efforts, that should be compatible with the United Nations Charter, constitute a very powerful mechanism given that the five permanent members of the Security Council of the United Nations are party to the Antarctic Treaty, and if on top of this the quantity of soldiers, population, gross domestic product, among others is added up from the 50 states parties to the treaty it is obvious that the states that are not parties to the Antarctic Treaty are at a great disadvantage in the case that they attempt to change the status quo in Antarctica either individually or collectively.
Estado moderno soberania
In this article the hows and whys of said mechanisms are laid out. In order to give an adequate response to these questions, we consider that one of the mechanisms that makes possible the enforcement of the Antarctic Treaty over third party states is international custom.
Although they are not definite and conclusive pronouncements, the unanimity that is required to adopt the ” measure ” suggests that there is a high degree of obligation in it and even more if one keeps in mind that there are two approval stages, one in the context of the Consultative Meeting and the other in which every state party to the treaty should adopt the ” measure ” in their respective internal legislation.
The big problem that could be pointed out with respect to this effect, in order to determine if there is international custom, concerns whether or not the general practice created by the Antarctic Treaty is accepted as law or, in other words, if the practice of using the Antarctic territory for peaceful purposes has opinio juris sive necessitatis In addition to diplomatic, economic, and military power that the Antarctic Teorg member states possess, a very serious aspect to consider is the coherence among the members of the Antarctic Treaty in materials concerning the subject matter of Antarctica since, despite the possible internal struggles within the group, the states dell have proven to be accomplices when faced with concerning challenges in the Antarctic System.
The Antarctic Treaty marks a fundamental milestone gsneral the handling of Antarctica. Based on the above, this effect could not be useful when arguing that the Antarctic Treaty had created international custom. According to that establish in Article IX of the Antarctic Treaty, Consultative Meetings take place every year, with the purpose of ” … exchanging information, mutually seeking advice on matters of common interest related with Antarctica, and formulating, estadl, and recommending to the governments measures to promote the principles and objectives of this treaty, including measures related to: After carrying out an analysis, we consider that in the given case that a third party state not party to the Antarctic Treaty is unaware of the principle of peaceful usage of Antarctica, it is possible to argue that this principle has constituted custom in international law and, therefore, valid against states that eventually denounce the Antarctic Treaty or that do not take part in it, position in which the Antarctic territory will be protected against a non-peaceful usage.
Carry out aerial observations in any moment in each and every Antarctic region. In order for this mechanism to be effective, the Contracting Parties should report in advanced the following: AlamedaPiso 3 Santiago – Chile Tel.: Of course, the members of the Antarctic System ignored this and other petitions that were made along the same lines in other General Assembly sessions and South Africa yeorg participating in institutions in the Antarctic System.
Their participation in these instances represents a contribution for the protection of the Antarctic territory since it advises and plays an active role in the environmental polices and the Antarctic fishing.
In order to determine this psychological character of obligation of peaceful usage of Antarctica, we consider the most useful test to be the treatment that has been given to the ” Question of Antarctica georf in the General Assembly of the United Nations, especially that expressed in the resolutions on this topic.