21 Jul This enables optimized XMPP performance over HF Radio (which STANAG was designed for) and over other data links using STANAG. R&S®STANAG is a communications solution for the robust and highly secure exchange of data using HF radio networks in line with R&S®STANAG R&S® STANAG is designed to support full remote control capabilities for the following R&S® HF transceiver families (including control for build-in modem .

Author: Mebei Majas
Country: Namibia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 15 February 2009
Pages: 151
PDF File Size: 3.65 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.67 Mb
ISBN: 877-1-31798-615-4
Downloads: 31734
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faukora

Further details on the use of personal data and the withdrawal procedure are set out in the Statement of Privacy.

STANAG – Wikipedia

Interoperable data sganag within joint and allied forces over long-distance HF radio networks is essential, especially if communications via other infrastructures such as satellites is unavailable, too expensive or vulnerable.

Discussion on other xmpp.

Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself. Permissions Permission is hereby staanag, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this specification the “Specification”to make stqnag of 566 Specification without restriction, including without limitation the rights to implement the Specification in a software program, deploy the Specification in a network service, and copy, modify, merge, publish, translate, distribute, sublicense, or sell copies of the Specification, and to permit persons to whom the Specification stang furnished to do so, subject to the condition that the foregoing copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Specification.

In practice, Edition 1 is only useful for very small numbers or radios, or where radios transmit for a low percentage of total time. When there is silence, if two radios start transmitting together, they conflict with each other and all data is lost.

Change your location X. This standards – or measurement -related article is a stub. The peer agreement will use this flow of stanzas to provide a service equivalent to the TCP connection or connections of XEP You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.


To enable us to optimize our website for you, cookies may be saved on your computer when you visit our website in order to analyze website browsing habits. Product Groups Message Handling Systems. The optimum modem parameters e. Older versions of this specification might be available at http: The standard is widely accepted and used by the forces of NATO, PfP partnership for peace and other nations around the globe. Key Facts Global data communications.

Edition 1, and Edition 2 until recently known as Edition 1, Amendment 1 radios do not attempt to transmit stanqg it is known that another radio is transmitting. However, exploratory implementations are encouraged to resume the standards process.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Views Read Edit View history. Articles lacking reliable references from November All articles lacking reliable references Articles with imported Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3. This causes problems when there are more than a few radios and traffic is high. More Information Accept X. STANAG controls which radio is transmitting and seeks to organize data to minimize the number of turnarounds.

In order to minimize the number of turnarounds, sending of acknowledgements is delayed.


The exchange of e-mail and IP-based information is vital for stnag successful planning and execution of sfanag operations. Edition 3 should be used for most deployments with medium and large numbers of radios. Please enter the characters shown in the image. The standard also defines two more layers, CAS which is intended to establish connections to other HF nodes and control the status of these connections, and DTS, which controls all the data manipulation for stang slicing, directioning, timing Because of potentially very low staang sending server MAY perform traffic optimisation, such as selective removal of stanzas that are not adding sufficient value, like CSNs, or strip selected elements such as xhtml-im.

Key Facts The exchange of e-mail and IP-based information is vital for the successful planning and execution of military operations. Email confirmation Do stanwg enter data in this field. Data and control interface to HF communications devices.

Support of various HF equipment Full remote control and monitoring. Benefits of using smaller DPDUs include:. Methods for automatically adapting to various HF transmission conditions Selection of the optimal configuration prior to a transmission Adaptive data rate change during a transmission. Looks like you’re from the United States. Unless separate permission is granted, modified works etanag are redistributed shall not contain misleading information regarding the authors, title, number, or publisher of the Specification, and shall not claim endorsement of the modified works by the authors, any organization or project to which the authors belong, or the XMPP Standards Foundation.


It is available on http: This combination of requirements is quite unlike any other communications medium, and special protocols are needed to efficiently transmit data over HF. November Learn how and when to remove this template message. There are two basic modes of transmission defined by this standard.

This document has been automatically 0566 after 12 months of inactivity in its previous Experimental state. Highest security level Extended remote control and monitoring features Optimal system integration capabilities Support of legacy ACP systems.

This 5606 MUST only be used where its use has been pre-agreed and configured for both participating servers. Limitation of Liability In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort including negligencecontract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts or agreed to in writing, shall the XMPP Standards Foundation or any author of this Specification be liable for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising from, out of, or in connection with the Specification or the implementation, deployment, or other use of the Specification including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial 566 or losseseven if the XMPP Stanav Foundation or such author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

Implementation of the protocol described herein is not recommended for production systems.

This reliably transfers the block of data to the destination. This enables a clean separation between application and modem. Interoperability with the widely used ACP legacy message handling system is supported by means of a gateway.

This military -related article is a stub.